A Time For Impeachment

May 14, 2013

My latest column is up at AND Magazine!

Here is an excerpt:

There is a time for everything, and a season for every activity under the heavens… Thus sayeth Ecclesiastes and The Byrds. With the slowly exploding controversy over last year’s events in Benghazi, where 4 Americans, including U.S. Ambassador to Libya Christopher Stevens, lost their lives, it seems that we should add yet another item to that Ecclesiastical list: A time to impeach.

After all, President Obama has been mired in scandal from his administration’s illegal actions for years already. The scandal of Operation Fast and Furious, where President Obama’s Justice Department was involved in “gun walking” – essentially turning a blind eye to weapons trafficking by Mexican drug cartels, ostensibly in an effort to “track” them, resulted in the deaths of at least one U.S. federal agent, and hundreds of civilians in Mexico. But just when Congress was making some headway in their investigation into how far up in the Executive Branch the culpability in Fast and Furious extended, President Obama himself stepped in, invoking Executive Privilege in order to hide key documents from the Congressional investigation.

To this day, Attorney General Eric Holder still has not answered to charges of Contempt of Congress in relation to the Fast and Furious investigation. Holder is the first sitting U.S. Attorney General to ever be found in contempt of Congress, yet he still holds office, continuing to blatantly thumb his nose at the Constitution with zero regard for his oath of office.

Janet Napolitano, who supposedly directs the Department of Homeland Security, has faced significant failures as well as being tied up herself in various borderline (if not totally) criminal activities. She has continually run her department with more of a focus on politics than security; she has repeatedly lied about the state of security along our southern border, she was responsible for the unnecessary release of hundreds of criminal aliens in a bid to exaggerate the effects of the budget sequester, and most recently, she lied under oath to a Congressional committee about a Saudi national who was deported due to national security concerns related to the Boston Marathon bombing. What’s more, early analysis of the events leading up to the terrorist attack in Boston have shown that the bombers were not deported, despite numerous warnings from both Russia and Saudi Arabia, because US intelligence agencies were not communicating with each other. This calls Napolitano’s competence into question, as well as begging the question of why the Department of Homeland Security still exists. It was created, after all, to ensure that our intelligence agencies were communicating with each other about potential threats, after similar communication failures were discovered during the investigations following 9/11. If, over a decade after the destruction of the World Trade Center, US intelligence agencies still aren’t communicating effectively, then maybe it’s time to fire Napolitano, disband DHS, and try an idea that might actually work.

Continue reading here.


The Insanity Of Equality

May 8, 2013

My latest column is up at AND Magazine!

Here is an excerpt:

For decades now, California has been known as the Land of the Fruits and Nuts. Now, the California legislature, which already seems all too intent on ensuring the state’s complete financial ruin, has taken political correctness and the LGBT agenda to an entirely new level.

This latest assault on sanity is known as AB 1266. It amends a section of California law known as “pupil’s rights,” basically pushing for complete gender integration in all aspects of California public schools. The bill is aimed at supposed transgendered students in California public schools, which I am sure are represented in sufficient numbers to justify passage of this travesty.

The bill is ill-conceived, at best, as it leaves the door wide open for the sexual integration of locker rooms and restrooms, with little thought given to the possible ramifications.

The actual text of the amended section of the California Education Code is simple enough. It reads:

“A pupil shall be permitted to participate in sex-segregated school programs and activities, including athletic teams and competitions, and use facilities consistent with his or her gender identity, irrespective of the gender listed on the pupil’s records.”Now, for those who don’t know, California, along with many other states in the US, has certain things known as “protected characteristics,” which are basically criteria upon which it is illegal to discriminate against another person. In California, those protected characteristics include sex, sexual orientation, and gender identity, and this is what brought about the advent of AB 1266.

Continue reading here.


You Might Be A Democrat

April 29, 2013

My latest column is up on Right Wing News!

Here is an excerpt:

You might be a Democrat if you believe…

  • Fighting against government-subsidized contraceptives constitutes a “war on women,” but when Islamists stone a woman to death because she was raped, it is just “cultural differences.”

  • The Second Amendment only guarantees the people’s right to own a musket, yet viewing Internet pornography in a public library is protected by the First.

  • Teaching multiple origin theories in public schools is an abhorrent dilution of science curriculum, but in history class, class time should focus on the contributions of homosexuals and ethnic minorities.

  • Teenagers should be able to get contraceptives or abortions without a parent’s permission, but sodas and other sugary drinks should be banned.

  • Only white people can be racist.

Continue reading here.

 


Barack Obama And The Racist Baby Killers

April 29, 2013

The historic president Barack Hussein Obama has taken yet another historic step by addressing Planned Parenthood at their annual gala.  He was originally scheduled to give the keynote address, but moved his speech to the day after at the last minute – likely due to heat he was already taking over his refusal to give a coherent response to the Kermit Gosnell trial simply because it was “ongoing,” even though that did not stop him in providing commentary when Cambridge police rightly arrested his friend (the president accused the police of “acting stupidly”), and his sound-off on the killing of Trayvon Martin (the president said “If I had a son, he’d look like Trayvon.”).  In both of those cases, the president placed his foot squarely in his mouth, heightening racial tensions that were already too high.

So maybe we could give President Obama the benefit of the doubt on the Gosnell trial…and we might, perhaps, if not for the president’s own past positions on abortion.  It is rather well-known by now – or, at the very least it should be – that when President Obama was a state senator in Illinois, he voted against a bill that would have required Illinois doctors to provide medical care to babies who survived botched abortions – meaning, in essence, that President Obama has no issue with the gruesome actions for which Kermit Gosnell is on trial.  And make no mistake: while President Obama has repeatedly made excuses and equivocations about his voting record, he has never plainly come out against this form of infanticide

But while the president would not give a direct verbal response to questions about the Gosnell trial, he has chosen instead to give his response in another way – by addressing the Planned Parenthood event.  Make no mistake – while the actions of most Planned Parenthood doctors may not be on the scale of the horrors committed by Gosnell, Planned Parenthood takes great pride in being “non-judgemental.”  It wasn’t that long ago that a pro-life group operative went to several Planned Parenthood clinics, posing as someone seeking a sex-selective abortion – seeking to terminate her pregnancy because she had found out that the baby was female.  In the spirit of non-judgementalism, the Planned Parenthood representatives went along with it…because according to Planned Parenthood, it doesn’t matter how morally abhorrent the reasoning is, it’s all about the “woman’s right to choose.”

barack-obamaBut President Obama, along with the entirety of America’s political Left, didn’t seem to care about this one bit.  Apparently, opposing women’s “right” to free, taxpayer-subsidized abortion and contraception constitutes more of a “war on women” than killing girl babies in the womb simply for being girls.

And this was the basic message of the president’s address to Planned Parenthood – the Right-Wing Republican bogeyman, clinging to their guns and their religion, are so vile, evil, and morally corrupt that they actually want to take away a woman’s right to sex-selective abortions!

I mean, how absolutely horrid is it that a major political party in 21st Century America actually doesn’t believe in snipping the spinal columns of babies after they’re born? How horridly judgmental!

President Obama, Planned Parenthood, and the rest of the pro-abortion Left love to use insinuations like “reproductive health” or “a woman’s right to choose” when speaking about abortion, but the truth must be that they just don’t care. “Safe, legal and rare” are little more than words with no meaning – of the three, the only one that is uttered with any sincerity is “legal.” They definitely don’t care to make abortion “rare,” or they would not push for it with such fervor…and as for “safe,” Planned Parenthood has been pushing for non-medical doctors to be allowed to perform abortions – because the procedure obviously is not dangerous enough as it is.

When President Obama comes out so strongly on the side of Planned Parenthood, it is important to remember just who it is that he is getting into bed with. After all, Planned Parenthood was founded by eugenicist Margaret Sanger, who believed in providing contraceptives and sterilization to those she believed were “undesirable.” The early eugenics movement in the United States started much the same way it did in Europe – the quest for the “master race.” We almost ended up being fortunate enough to evade the horrors of the concentration camps, and yet today Josef Mengele is no longer an abstraction from a bygone era – he is among us.

Kermit Gosnell may be the worst of the worst, but he may just be the tip of the iceberg. Planned Parenthood may provide some other ancillary services, but killing the unborn is both their largest service offering and their biggest moneymaker, and the American taxpayers enjoy the privilege of subsidizing it all, with no choice and no say, no matter how much they may disagree with the despicable practice.

When President Obama stood in front of that crowd and said “God bless you,” he was invoking the blessings of the Almighty on one of the greatest genocides in human history.

Abortion advocates go to great extremes to deny the humanity of unborn humans, perhaps because acknowledging the truth – that whether they call it a fetus, a “clump of cells,” or whatever other dehumanizing term they may choose, admitting that an unborn child is a human being brings a stark reality to the horrors that have been inflicted on the next generation that is almost unfathomable.

“If it only saves one child’s life,” the President says as he tries to take away the people’s right to defend themselves from the tyranny he is attempting to construct, “it will be worth it.” And yet, when it comes to ending countless children’s’ lives, that very same president says “Planned Parenthood is here to stay,” and invokes the blessings of Almighty God Himself on the slaughter of the next generation.


Hatred And Control

April 25, 2013

My latest column is up on AND Magazine!

Here is an excerpt:

The past week has been truly remarkable: starting out with an unspeakable tragedy, ending with a tense manhunt and the eventual killing of one terrorist, and capture of another.

In the midst of all of this, we were, yet again, treated to the same bogus theories, thrown out carelessly, flippantly from those left-wing pundits who sing the same tune each and every time tragedy strikes in America. Because it was April 15, and the attack occurred in Boston, it had to be the Tea Party, they said. They were almost salivating, so eager were they to finally, finally see their hopes and dreams for the conservative movement come to pass.

As we all know, the modern Tea Party movement has a long, sordid history of violence and terrorism – since its inception just a few short years ago, we have seen them perpetrating, or attempting to perpetrate numerous acts of terrorism, including one Tea Party member who attempted to detonate a bomb on a passenger plane that he had smuggled on board in his underwear, another who attempted to detonate a car bomb in Times Square, a man who flew a small plane into an IRS office in Houston, another man who, spurred on by the hateful vitriol contained in a graphic on Sarah Palin‘s website, attempted to assassinate former Congresswoman Gabrielle Giffords, and yet another man who walked into a movie theater in Aurora, Colorado and opened fire…and all of this is in addition to the Boston Marathon bombing.

Continue reading here.


Flailing Blindly For Imaginary Extremists, Ignoring The Real Ones

April 18, 2013

With all of the confusion and chaos over the Boston Marathon bombing, with reporters, pundits and columnists breathlessly hoping that the bomber turns out to be a white conservative, it seems that another incident involving a left-wing radical is being swept under the rug.

Just over the past few days, we have had a terrorist bombing at the Boston Marathon, with a massive manhunt, conflicting reports about arrests and suspicion, a Saudi national first apparently being looked at as a person of interest, and then reportedly being deported for “national security” reasons, and the aforementioned hopes that the bomber turns out to be a white male.

A story that initially generated a lot of press, but seemingly has been squeezed out by news surrounding the ongoing investigation of the Boston bombing is the ricin-laced letters that were mailed to President Obama and Senator Roger Wicker.  As it turns out, it wasn’t too difficult for bloggers to track down the man who is now the prime suspect: a left-wing activist named Paul Kevin Curtis.

Given the news media’s purposeful ignoring of the absolutely shocking testimony coming out of the Gosnell trial, it’s no surprise that they would ignore Paul Kevin Curtis, as well – ignoring stories that don’t further their agenda, while promoting stories that do has been a long-standing tactic of the mainstream liberal media.

CBS News has a report on the suspect, but goes to great lengths to describe his activism without mentioning his political affiliations…but at least they mention the fact that he is an Elvis impersonator.


Thoughts On The Tragedy In Boston

April 16, 2013

Like many across the nation, I was shocked and horrified when I heard the news of the bombing at the Boston Marathon. And like many, I followed the news of the tragedy, the confusion, the “fog of war,” as it always seems to happen when tragedy strikes.

Upon hearing the news, my first thoughts were of shock and horror, and I said a prayer for the injured and those responding to the emergency. But following soon after that was the thought “what freedoms will be sacrificed in the aftermath of this tragedy?”

Perhaps it is just a result of the 24-hour news cycle, but it seems that every time tragedy strikes, it follows a predictable pattern.

As soon as the networks run out of information, the repetition starts. You hear the same narrative again and again, as they wait for something new to come across the news desk. The same images and footage get run again and again.

And then the speculation starts.

Always eager to be the first to report it, the pundits inevitably start putting forward their theories on who may have committed the attack, and the narrative always seems to be the same. Not matter how much (or how little) evidence, the fingers always start pointing, and they always seem to point in the wrong direction.

It’s time for the constant blame games to stop. While both sides of the political aisle constantly accuse each other of incivility, our humanity gets lost in a fog of politics. We shouldn’t have to deal with the constant finger-pointing and mindless speculation. The pundits who make the same incorrect assumptions and false accusations time after time should be shamed and forced off of the air. And while I am not naive enough to think that will actually happen, I still retain enough faith in humanity to hope that it could.

The politics of the 24-hour news cycle seem to rob our nation of its humanity. It is hard to say when it started, but at least since former President Clinton attempted to blame the Oklahoma City Bombing on talk radio with no evidence to back it up, the trend just keeps getting worse and worse, and it is time for Americans of all stripes to stand together and say “no.” As emotional as tragic events can be, we should not allow our humanity and our compassion to be robbed of us just because some pundits want to make headlines.


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 3,513 other followers